The behavior of federal judges : a theoretical and empirical study of rational choice /

From the publisher. Judges play a central role in the American legal system, but their behavior as decision-makers is not well understood, even among themselves. The system permits judges to be quite secretive (and most of them are), so indirect methods are required to make sense of their behavior....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Epstein, Lee, 1958-
Other Authors: Landes, William M, Posner, Richard A
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2013
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 778991177
003 OCoLC
005 20130118000000.0
008 120229s2013 maua b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2012008907 
020 |a 9780674049895 
020 |a 0674049896 
035 |a (SKY)246554859 
040 |a DLC  |c DLC  |d DLC  |d SKYRV 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a VLA 
050 0 0 |a KF5130  |b .E67 2013 
100 1 |a Epstein, Lee,  |d 1958- 
245 1 4 |a The behavior of federal judges :  |b a theoretical and empirical study of rational choice /  |c Lee Epstein, William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner 
260 |a Cambridge, Mass. :  |b Harvard University Press,  |c 2013 
300 |a xv, 422 p. :  |b ill. ;  |c 25 cm 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
505 0 |a A realistic theory of judicial behavior -- The previous empirical literature -- The Supreme Court -- The Courts of Appeals -- The district courts and the selection effect -- Dissents and dissent aversion -- The questioning of lawyers at oral argument -- The auditioners 
520 |a From the publisher. Judges play a central role in the American legal system, but their behavior as decision-makers is not well understood, even among themselves. The system permits judges to be quite secretive (and most of them are), so indirect methods are required to make sense of their behavior. Here, a political scientist, an economist, and a judge work together to construct a unified theory of judicial decision-making. Using statistical methods to test hypotheses, they dispel the mystery of how judicial decisions in district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court are made. The authors derive their hypotheses from a labor-market model, which allows them to consider judges as they would any other economic actors: as self-interested individuals motivated by both the pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects of their work. In the authors' view, this model describes judicial behavior better than either the traditional "legalist" theory, which sees judges as automatons who mechanically apply the law to the facts, or the current dominant theory in political science, which exaggerates the ideological component in judicial behavior. Ideology does figure into decision-making at all levels of the federal judiciary, the authors find, but its influence is not uniform. It diminishes as one moves down the judicial hierarchy from the Supreme Court to the courts of appeals to the district courts. As The Behavior of Federal Judges demonstrates, the good news is that ideology does not extinguish the influence of other components in judicial decision-making. Federal judges are not just robots or politicians in robes 
650 0 |a Judicial process  |z United States 
700 1 |a Landes, William M 
700 1 |a Posner, Richard A 
907 |a .b2179957 
998 |a secnd 
999 |c 102352 
852 |a Law Library  |b Second Floor  |h KF5130 .E67 2013  |p 33940004212252