Baseball on trial : the origin of baseball's antitrust exemption /

"In Baseball on Trial, legal scholar Nathaniel Grow defies conventional wisdom to explain why the unanimous Supreme Court opinion authored by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, which gave rise to Major League Baseball's exemption from antitrust law, was correct given the circumstances of the t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grow, Nathaniel
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Urbana, Illinois : University of Illinois Press, [2014]
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 849740938
003 OCoLC
005 20181030023226.0
008 130612s2014 ilua b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2013023552 
020 |a 9780252038198 
020 |a 0252038193 
020 |a 9780252079757 
020 |a 0252079752 
037 |b Univ of Illinois Pr, C/O Chicago Distribution Center 11030 S Langley Ave, Chicago, IL, USA, 60628  |n SAN 202-5280 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |e rda  |c DLC  |d YDX  |d BDX  |d BTCTA  |d OCLCF  |d YDXCP  |d CDX  |d GZL  |d UKMGB  |d ZCU  |d COO  |d RCJ  |d CLU  |d STF  |d CHVBK  |d OCLCQ  |d CUH  |d SFR 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a VLAM 
050 0 0 |a KF3989  |b .G76 2014 
100 1 |a Grow, Nathaniel, 
245 1 0 |a Baseball on trial :  |b the origin of baseball's antitrust exemption /  |c Nathaniel Grow 
260 |a Urbana, Illinois :  |b University of Illinois Press,  |c [2014] 
300 |a 282 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 24 cm 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 265-271) and index 
505 0 |a The rivalry begins : 1913 -- The opening salvos : December 1913 to June 1914 -- The federal league strikes back : June 1914 to December 1914 -- The Landis Case : January 1915 -- The long wait : February 1915 to February 1916 -- An aborted trial : February 1916 to June 1917 -- Baltimore goes to trial, again : June 1917 to April 1919 -- The defense and verdict : April 1919 -- The appeal and final decision : May 1919 to October 1922 
520 |a "In Baseball on Trial, legal scholar Nathaniel Grow defies conventional wisdom to explain why the unanimous Supreme Court opinion authored by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, which gave rise to Major League Baseball's exemption from antitrust law, was correct given the circumstances of the time. Currently a billion dollar enterprise, professional baseball teams crisscross the country while the game are broadcast via radio, television, and internet coast to coast. The sheer scope of the activity would seem to embody the phrase 'interstate commerce.' Yet baseball is the only professional sport - indeed the sole industry - in the United States that currently benefits from a judicially constructed antitrust immunity. How could this be? Drawing upon recently released documents from the National Baseball Hall of Fame, Grow analyzes how the Supreme Court reached this seemingly peculiar result by tracing the Federal Baseball litigation from its roots in 1914 to its resolution in 1922, in the process uncovering significant new details about the proceedings. Grow ultimately concludes that, despite the frequent criticism of the opinion, the Supreme Court's decision was consistent with the conditions and legal climate of the twentieth century"--Unedited summary from book cover 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Sherman Act 
610 2 0 |a National League of Professional Baseball Clubs  |x Trials, litigation, etc 
650 0 |a Baseball  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |x History 
650 0 |a Antitrust law  |z United States  |x History 
650 0 |a Professional sports contracts  |z United States  |x History 
907 |a .b2230434 
998 |a secnd 
999 |c 107226 
852 |a Law Library  |b Second Floor  |h KF3989 .G76 2014  |p 33940004291710