Prohibition, the Constitution, and states' rights /

Colorado's legalization of marijuana spurred intense debate about the extent to which the Constitution preempts state-enacted laws and statutes. Colorado's legal cannabis program generated a strange scenario in which many politicians, including many who freely invoke the Tenth Amendment, s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beienburg, Sean
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 1051682871
003 OCoLC
005 20191023115408.0
008 190115t20192019ilub b 001 0 eng c
010 |a 2019002015 
020 |a 9780226631943 
020 |a 022663194X 
020 |a 9780226632131 
020 |a 022663213X 
040 |a PUL  |b eng  |e rda  |c PUL  |d OCLCO  |d GZL  |d CLU  |d GUL  |d OCLCQ 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a VLAM 
050 0 0 |a KF3919  |b .B45 2019 
100 1 |a Beienburg, Sean 
245 1 0 |a Prohibition, the Constitution, and states' rights /  |c Sean Beienburg 
260 |a Chicago ;  |a London :  |b The University of Chicago Press,  |c 2019 
300 |a ix, 322 pages :  |b maps ;  |c 24 cm 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 253-309) and index 
505 0 |a Introduction: Prohibition, now and then -- Alcohol and liberalism : before national prohibition -- Prohibition and federalism : the road to the Sheppard Amendment -- Ratifying and implementing the Sheppard Amendment (1918-21) -- Ratifying and implementing II (1918-21) : the Northeast -- The dry tide recedes (1922-23) -- Constitutional obligations (1923-24) -- Taking alcohol to the people of the states (1925-28) -- The noble experiment (1929-31) -- The dam breaks (1932-33) -- Conclusion: Prohibition and American constitutionalism -- Coda: Pot and popular constitutionalism : Prohibition's lessons for the marijuana legalization debate 
520 8 |a Colorado's legalization of marijuana spurred intense debate about the extent to which the Constitution preempts state-enacted laws and statutes. Colorado's legal cannabis program generated a strange scenario in which many politicians, including many who freely invoke the Tenth Amendment, seemed to be attacking the progressive state for asserting states' rights. Unusual as this may seem, this has happened before - in the early part of the twentieth century, as America concluded a decades-long struggle over the suppression of alcohol during Prohibition. Sean Beienburg recovers a largely forgotten constitutional debate, revealing how Prohibition became a battlefield on which skirmishes of American political development, including the debate over federalism and states' rights, were fought. Beienburg focuses on the massive extension of federal authority involved in Prohibition and the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment, describing the roles and reactions of not just Congress, the presidents, and the Supreme Court but political actors throughout the states, who jockeyed with one another to claim fidelity to the Tenth Amendment while reviling nationalism and nullification alike. The most comprehensive treatment of the constitutional debate over Prohibition to date, the book concludes with a discussion of the parallels and differences between Prohibition in the 1920s and debates about the legalization of marijuana today 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Constitution.  |n 18th Amendment 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Constitution.  |n 21st Amendment 
650 0 |a Prohibition  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century 
650 0 |a Federal government  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century 
650 0 |a Prohibition  |x Political aspects  |z United States  |x History  |y 20th century 
651 0 |a United States  |x Politics and government  |y 1919-1933 
907 |a .b2421562 
998 |a secnd 
999 |c 115821 
852 |a Law Library  |b Second Floor  |h KF3919 .B45 2019  |p 33940004531099