Trial evidence /

Mauet (law, U. of Arizona) and retired judge Wolfson (law, DePaul U.) use the "three R's"--relevant, reliability, and right--as an analytical framework to show how judges and lawyers think about evidence in trials. The material is organized by the stages of a trial and with more infor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mauet, Thomas A
Other Authors: Wolfson, Warren D
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: New York : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2012
Edition:5th ed
Series:Aspen coursebook series
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 759179705
003 OCoLC
005 20120720000000.0
006 m d
008 111118s2012 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2011048125 
020 |a 9781454810186 (pbk. : alk. paper) 
020 |a 1454810181 (pbk. : alk. paper) 
035 |a (SKY)244901262 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |c DLC  |d BTCTA  |d GUL  |d YDXCP  |d BN2  |d UtOrBLW  |d SKYRV 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a VLA 
050 0 0 |a KF8935  |b .M28 2012 
100 1 |a Mauet, Thomas A 
245 1 0 |a Trial evidence /  |c Thomas A. Mauet, Warren D. Wolfson 
250 |a 5th ed 
260 |a New York :  |b Wolters Kluwer Law & Business,  |c 2012 
300 |a xxi, 481 p. ;  |c 26 cm. 
490 1 |a Aspen coursebook series 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index 
505 0 |a An advocacy approach to trial evidence -- The role and power of the trial judge : evidentiary objections before and during trial -- Opening statements -- Direct examination of witnesses : basic considerations -- Direct examination of witnesses : relevance -- Direct examination of witnesses : hearsay and non-hearsay -- Direct examination of witnesses : hearsay exceptions -- Direct examination of witnesses : policy exclusions and privileges -- Direct examination of experts -- Exhibits -- Judicial notice and presumptions -- Cross-examination and impeachment of lay and expert witnesses -- Redirect, recross, rebuttal, and surrebuttal -- Closing arguments 
520 |a Mauet (law, U. of Arizona) and retired judge Wolfson (law, DePaul U.) use the "three R's"--relevant, reliability, and right--as an analytical framework to show how judges and lawyers think about evidence in trials. The material is organized by the stages of a trial and with more information on topics of interest to judges and trial lawyers. The authors show where evidence rules are commonly used and how the lawyer uses them to persuade the judge deciding evidentiary issues. The book does not address evidence from a historical, social policy, or comparative law perspective, nor does it critically analyze the existing rules or interpretative case law. Rather, it analyzes these rules functionally and shows how they apply in the courtroom and how lawyers can use the law as a functional tool to persuade judges. Each chapter has law and practice sections, with functional overviews of the Federal Rules of Evidence referring to major treatises and examples of their use before and during trials, how lawyers can make evidentiary objections, and how judges make rulings, based on actual federal and state cases. The accompanying CD contains practice exercises based on real cases. Aspen Publishers is now Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. Annotation ©2012 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com) 
650 0 |a Evidence (Law)  |z United States 
700 1 |a Wolfson, Warren D 
830 0 |a Aspen coursebook series 
907 |a .b2168212 
998 |a res 
999 |c 101488 
852 |a Law Library  |b Reserve  |h KF8935 .M28 2012  |p 33940004189310