Amnesty justified? : the need for a case by case approach in the interests of human rights /

"The manner in which South Africa dealt with its past and the process of granting amnesty through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is generally considered legitimate. This is not the case, however, for many other amnesties granted in times of political transition or in post-conflict situ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vriezen, Vera, 1981-
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland : Intersentia, ©2012
Series:School of Human Rights Research series ; v. 52
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 03396cam a2200385 a 4500
001 798054401
003 OCoLC
005 20180928115818.0
008 130227s2012 enka b 000 0 eng d
010 |a 2012540366 
020 |a 9781780680750 
020 |a 1780680759 
040 |a OHX  |b eng  |c DLC  |d OHX  |d OCLCO  |d ZCL  |d UKMGB  |d BTCTA  |d YDXCP  |d BWK  |d YNK  |d RCJ  |d CUD  |d ERASA  |d LGG  |d YLS  |d CDX  |d CHUNN  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d CHVBK  |d OCLCQ  |d CUH 
041 0 |a eng  |b dut 
042 |a lccopycat 
049 |a VLAM 
050 0 0 |a K5132  |b .V75 2012 
100 1 |a Vriezen, Vera,  |d 1981- 
245 1 0 |a Amnesty justified? :  |b the need for a case by case approach in the interests of human rights /  |c Vera Vriezen 
260 |a Cambridge ;  |a Antwerp ;  |a Portland :  |b Intersentia,  |c ©2012 
300 |a xvii, 270 pages :  |b illustrations ;  |c 24 cm 
490 1 |a School of human rights research series ;  |v v. 52 
500 |a Revised thesis (doctoral)--Tilburg University, 2011 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 235-261) 
505 0 0 |t General introduction --  |t Impunity --  |t Amnesty --  |t The legality of international amnesty laws under international law --  |t The United Nations' position and practice on impunity, amnesties and the duty to prosecute --  |t Amnesty and the rights of victims --  |t Framework for the legitimate use of amnesty 
520 |a "The manner in which South Africa dealt with its past and the process of granting amnesty through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is generally considered legitimate. This is not the case, however, for many other amnesties granted in times of political transition or in post-conflict situations. National efforts to establish peace and democracy often clash with international legal demands. Notwithstanding the practice of nation states often preferring amnesty to prosecution as a means of dealing with their violent past, international law is clearly moving in a direction in which impunity and thus amnesty have no place. Nevertheless, in political transitions or post-conflict situations, states need to balance the need to (re)build the rule of law with the need to end human rights violations. Foreclosing the possibility of granting amnesty might seriously invalidate a useful tool for ending or preventing wars, facilitating the transition to democratic civilian regimes or aiding the process of reconciliation. The core question of this study is what kind of amnesty laws can be considered legitimate in the light of the need to combine respect for human rights and the rule of law with the need to restore peace and public order. The study is dedicated to answering that question by examining the legality of national amnesty laws under international law, by looking into the United Nations' position and practice on the subject, and by defining the rights of victims related to the practice of granting amnesty. The author determines the factors that are of importance when reviewing an amnesty measure or for actors considering granting amnesty, and develops a framework for the legitimate use of amnesty"--P. [4] of cover 
546 |a Acknowledgments and summary in Dutch 
650 0 |a Amnesty 
650 0 |a Prosecution 
650 0 |a Human rights 
830 0 |a School of Human Rights Research series ;  |v v. 52 
907 |a .b2187024 
998 |a lower 
999 |c 103048 
852 |a Law Library  |b Lower Level  |h K5132 .V75 2012  |p 33940004225734