Terror detentions and the rule of law : US and UK perspectives /

"After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States and the United Kingdom detained suspected terrorists in a manner incompatible with the due process, fair trial, and equality requirements of the Rule of Law. The legality of the detentions was challenged and found wanting by the highest court...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wagstaff, Robert H. (Robert Hall), 1941-
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: New York : Oxford University Press, [2014]
Series:Terrorism and global justice series
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 841228499
003 OCoLC
005 20140704000000.0
008 130426s2014 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2013017239 
020 |a 9780199301553 (hardback : alk. paper) 
020 |a 0199301557 (hardback : alk. paper) 
035 |a (SKY)255552947 
040 |a DLC  |b eng  |c DLC  |e rda  |d DLC  |d SKYRV 
042 |a pcc 
043 |a e-uk---  |a n-us--- 
049 |a VLA 
050 0 0 |a K5437  |b .W34 2014 
100 1 |a Wagstaff, Robert H.  |q (Robert Hall),  |d 1941- 
245 1 0 |a Terror detentions and the rule of law :  |b US and UK perspectives /  |c Robert H. Wagstaff 
260 |a New York :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c [2014] 
300 |a xxiv, 368 p. :  |b ill. ;  |c 25 cm 
490 0 |a Terrorism and global justice series 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 321-344) and index 
505 0 |a The precipitating events -- A short history of panic responses -- Detention and the legal status & rights of aliens -- The role of the courts & the popular jurisprudence of counterterrorism -- The rule of law -- An applicable international rule of law -- Guantanamo & Belmarsh -- The war paradigm versus the criminal law in the United States and United Kingdom -- R v A : Marbury judicial review by interpretation in the United Kingdom -- Judicial deference 
520 |a "After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States and the United Kingdom detained suspected terrorists in a manner incompatible with the due process, fair trial, and equality requirements of the Rule of Law. The legality of the detentions was challenged and found wanting by the highest courts in the US and UK. The US courts approached these questions as matters within the law of war, whereas the UK courts examined them within a human rights criminal law context. In Terror Detentions and the Rule of Law: US and UK Perspectives, Robert Wagstaff documents President George W. Bush's and Prime Minister Tony Blair's responses to 9/11, alleging that they failed to protect the human rights of individuals suspected of terrorist activity. The analytical focus is on the four US Supreme Court decisions involving detentions in Guantanamo Bay and four House of Lords decisions involving detentions that began in the Belmarsh Prison. These decisions are analyzed within the contexts of history, criminal law, constitutional law, human rights and international law, and various jurisprudential perspectives. Time-tested criminal law is the normatively correct and most effective means for dealing with suspected terrorists. Preventive, indefinite detention of terrorist suspects upon suspicion of wrongdoing contravenes the domestic and international Rule of Law, treaties, and customary international law. As such, new legal paradigms for addressing terrorism are shown to be normatively invalid, illegal, unconstitutional, counter-productive, and in conflict with the Rule of Law"--Unedited summary from book jacket 
650 0 |a Detention of persons  |z United States 
650 0 |a Detention of persons  |z Great Britain 
650 0 |a Terrorism  |z United States 
650 0 |a Terrorism  |z Great Britain 
650 0 |a Rule of law  |z United States 
650 0 |a Rule of law  |z Great Britain 
907 |a .b2230367 
998 |a lower 
999 |c 107213 
852 |a Law Library  |b Lower Level  |h K5437 .W34 2014  |p 33940004291397