In search of criminal responsibility : ideas, interest and institutions /
What makes someone responsible for a crime and therefore liable of punishment under the criminal law? Modern lawyers will quickly and easily point to the criminal law's requirement of concurrent actus reus and mens rea, doctrines of the criminal law which ensure that someone will only be found...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, United Kingdom :
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Edition: | First edition |
Series: | Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 952567068 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20170404000000.0 | ||
008 | 151130s2016 enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |a 2015958967 | ||
020 | |a 9780199248209 (hbk.) | ||
020 | |a 0199248206 | ||
020 | |a 9780199248216 (pbk.) | ||
020 | |a 0199248214 (pbk.) | ||
035 | |a (SKY)279726839 | ||
040 | |a ERASA |b eng |c ERASA |e rda |d OCLCO |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d CDX |d OCLCO |d BTCTA |d OCLCF |d BDX |d NYP |d DLC |d SKYRV | ||
042 | |a lccopycat | ||
043 | |a e-uk--- | ||
049 | |a VLA | ||
050 | 0 | 0 | |a KD7890 |b .L33 2016 |
100 | 1 | |a Lacey, Nicola, | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a In search of criminal responsibility : |b ideas, interest and institutions / |c Nicola Lacey |
250 | |a First edition | ||
260 | |a Oxford, United Kingdom : |b Oxford University Press |c 2016 | ||
300 | |a xviii, 236 pages ; |c 24 cm | ||
490 | 1 | |a Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 207-228) and index | ||
505 | 0 | |a In search of criminal responsibility -- Ideas -- Interests -- Institutions -- Explaining the shifting alignment of ideas of responsibility in the vortex of interests and institutions: towards a political economy of responsibility in English criminal law -- Implications for legal theory and legal scholarship | |
520 | 8 | |a What makes someone responsible for a crime and therefore liable of punishment under the criminal law? Modern lawyers will quickly and easily point to the criminal law's requirement of concurrent actus reus and mens rea, doctrines of the criminal law which ensure that someone will only be found criminally responsible if they have committed criminal conduct while possessing capacities of understanding, awareness, and self-control at the time of offense. Any notion of criminal responsibility based on the character of the offender, meaning an implication of criminality based on reputation or the assumed disposition of the person, would seem to today's criminal lawyer a relic of the 18th Century. In this volume, Nicola Lacey demonstrates that the practice of character-based patterns of attribution was not laid to rest in 18th Century criminal law, but is alive and well in contemporary English criminal responsibility-attribution | |
650 | 0 | |a Criminal liability |z Great Britain | |
650 | 0 | |a Criminal intent |z Great Britain | |
830 | 0 | |a Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice | |
907 | |a .b2298107 | ||
998 | |a lower | ||
999 | |c 123955 | ||
852 | |a Law Library |b Lower Level |h KD7890 .L33 2016 |p 33940004398721 |