In the Supreme Court of the United States, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Luis Ramon Morales-Santana, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : brief amici curiae of professors of history, political science, and law in support of respondent /
The question presented is whether a federal law imposing different physical presence requirements on unwed citizen mothers and unwed citizen fathers with respect to conferring citizenship on their foreign-born children is an unconstitutional violation of equal protection.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , |
| Other Authors: | , |
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Washington, D.C. :
Department of Justice,
[2016]
|
| Series: | Subject compilation of state laws.
Immigration law & policy in the U.S. |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ccn00817444 | ||
| 006 | m fo d | ||
| 007 | cr bn nnnauuuu | ||
| 008 | 170627s2016 dcu obv 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a NjRocCCS |b eng |e rda |c NjRocCCS | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stetson, Catherine E., |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Luis Ramon Morales-Santana, respondent : |b on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : brief amici curiae of professors of history, political science, and law in support of respondent / |c Catherine E. Stetson [and 3 others]. |
| 246 | 1 | |i HeinOnline index title: |a Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, petitioner, v. Luis Ramon Morales Santana, respondent : brief amici curiae of professors of history, political science, and law in support of respondent | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. : |b Department of Justice, |c [2016] | |
| 264 | 2 | |a [Getzville, New York] : |b William S. Hein & Company, |c [2017] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 38, 6a pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a HeinOnline subject compilation of state laws | |
| 490 | 1 | |a HeinOnline immigration law & policy in the U.S. | |
| 500 | |a "No. 15-1191." | ||
| 500 | |a "October 4, 2016." | ||
| 504 | |a "Table of authorities": pages iv-xi. | ||
| 520 | |a The question presented is whether a federal law imposing different physical presence requirements on unwed citizen mothers and unwed citizen fathers with respect to conferring citizenship on their foreign-born children is an unconstitutional violation of equal protection. | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed June 27, 2017. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Citizenship |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Equality before the law |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Emigration and immigration law |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Records and briefs. |2 lcgft | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lynch, Loretta, |d 1959- |e petitioner. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morales-Santana, Luis Ramon, |e respondent. | |
| 710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) | |
| 710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Subject compilation of state laws. | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Immigration law & policy in the U.S. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.scsl/llprofac0001&id=1&size=2&collection=scsl&index=alpha/L_scslbooks |
| 949 | |a KF 229 .M67 S73 2016 |w LC |c 1 |i 817444-1001 |d 5/10/2019 |l MAIN |m HEN |q 2 |r Y |s Y |t WEB |u 6/27/2017 |x ENG |z N-US | ||
| 997 | |a ©2017 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. | ||
| 998 | |a inter | ||
| 999 | |c 148014 | ||
| 852 | |a Law Library |b online | ||