In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents : on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : amicus brief of the states of Ohio, Montana, and 14 other states supporting petitioners /
The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[United States] :
[publisher not identified],
[2013]
|
| Series: | Subject compilation of state laws.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed evidence of fetal pain and increased maternal health risk prior to viability. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "No. 13-402." "October 2013"--Page 25. |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (x, 25 pages). |
| Bibliography: | "Table of authorities": pages v-x. |