In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents : on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : amicus brief of the states of Ohio, Montana, and 14 other states supporting petitioners /
The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[United States] :
[publisher not identified],
[2013]
|
Series: | Subject compilation of state laws.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ccn00449834 | ||
006 | m fo d | ||
007 | cr bn nnnauuuu | ||
008 | 140625s2013 xxu obv 000 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a NjRocCCS |b eng |e rda |c NjRocCCS | ||
043 | |a n-us--- |a n-us-az | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fox, Timothy C., |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents : |b on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : amicus brief of the states of Ohio, Montana, and 14 other states supporting petitioners / |c Timothy C. Fox [and 5 others]. |
246 | 1 | |i HeinOnline index title: |a Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents; on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; amicus brief of the States of Ohio, Montana, et al. | |
264 | 1 | |a [United States] : |b [publisher not identified], |c [2013] | |
264 | 2 | |a [Getzville, New York] : |b William S. Hein & Company, |c [2014] | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 25 pages). | ||
336 | |a text |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a HeinOnline subject compilation of state laws | |
500 | |a "No. 13-402." | ||
500 | |a "October 2013"--Page 25. | ||
504 | |a "Table of authorities": pages v-x. | ||
520 | |a The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed evidence of fetal pain and increased maternal health risk prior to viability. | ||
588 | |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed June 25, 2014. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation |z United States |v Cases. | |
650 | 0 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation |z Arizona |v Cases. | |
650 | 0 | |a Trials (Abortion) |z United States. | |
650 | 0 | |a Trials (Abortion) |z Arizona. | |
650 | 0 | |a Fetus |x Development |x Law and legislation |z United States |v Cases. | |
655 | 7 | |a Records and briefs. |2 lcgft | |
700 | 1 | |a Isaacson, Paul A., |e respondent. | |
710 | 1 | |a Arizona, |e petitioner. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. | |
830 | 0 | |a Subject compilation of state laws. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |3 HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.scsl/thopiab0001&id=1&collection=scsl&index=scslbooks#1 |
949 | |a KF 229 .A75 F69 2013 |w LC |c 1 |i 449834-2001 |d 6/26/2014 |l MAIN |m HEN |q 1 |r Y |s Y |t WEB |u 6/26/2014 |x ENG |z N-US | ||
997 | |a ©2014 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. | ||
998 | |a inter | ||
999 | |c 158249 | ||
852 | |a Law Library |b online |