In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents : on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : amicus brief of the states of Ohio, Montana, and 14 other states supporting petitioners /

The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fox, Timothy C. (Author)
Corporate Authors: Arizona (petitioner.), United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit), United States. Supreme Court
Other Authors: Isaacson, Paul A. (Respondent)
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: [United States] : [publisher not identified], [2013]
Series:Subject compilation of state laws.
Subjects:
Online Access:HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 i 4500
001 ccn00449834
006 m fo d
007 cr bn nnnauuuu
008 140625s2013 xxu obv 000 0 eng d
040 |a NjRocCCS  |b eng  |e rda  |c NjRocCCS 
043 |a n-us---  |a n-us-az 
100 1 |a Fox, Timothy C.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents :  |b on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : amicus brief of the states of Ohio, Montana, and 14 other states supporting petitioners /  |c Timothy C. Fox [and 5 others]. 
246 1 |i HeinOnline index title:  |a Tom Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., petitioners, v. Paul A. Isaacson, et al., respondents; on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; amicus brief of the States of Ohio, Montana, et al. 
264 1 |a [United States] :  |b [publisher not identified],  |c [2013] 
264 2 |a [Getzville, New York] :  |b William S. Hein & Company,  |c [2014] 
300 |a 1 online resource (x, 25 pages). 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a HeinOnline subject compilation of state laws 
500 |a "No. 13-402." 
500 |a "October 2013"--Page 25. 
504 |a "Table of authorities": pages v-x. 
520 |a The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether Arizona law prohibiting abortions several weeks prior to the viability standard established by Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, or whether that standard should be re-examined based on claimed evidence of fetal pain and increased maternal health risk prior to viability. 
588 |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed June 25, 2014. 
650 0 |a Abortion  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Abortion  |x Law and legislation  |z Arizona  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Trials (Abortion)  |z United States. 
650 0 |a Trials (Abortion)  |z Arizona. 
650 0 |a Fetus  |x Development  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |v Cases. 
655 7 |a Records and briefs.  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Isaacson, Paul A.,  |e respondent. 
710 1 |a Arizona,  |e petitioner. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
830 0 |a Subject compilation of state laws. 
856 4 0 |3 HeinOnline Subject Compilation of State Laws  |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.scsl/thopiab0001&id=1&collection=scsl&index=scslbooks#1 
949 |a KF 229 .A75 F69 2013  |w LC  |c 1  |i 449834-2001  |d 6/26/2014  |l MAIN  |m HEN  |q 1  |r Y  |s Y  |t WEB  |u 6/26/2014  |x ENG  |z N-US 
997 |a ©2014 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. 
998 |a inter 
999 |c 158249 
852 |a Law Library  |b online