In the Supreme Court of the United States, the Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home, petitioner, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., respondents : Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al., respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit : brief of amicus curiae the Catholic Benefits Association in support of petitioners /
At issue is (1) whether a litigant who is directly protected by an administrative rule and has been allowed to intervene to defend it lacks standing to appeal a decision invalidating the rule if the litigant is also protected by an injunction from a different court, and (2) whether the federal gover...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Washington, D.C. :
Wilson-epes Printing Co., Inc.,
[2020]
|
Series: | Religion and the law.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | HeinOnline Religion and the Law |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | At issue is (1) whether a litigant who is directly protected by an administrative rule and has been allowed to intervene to defend it lacks standing to appeal a decision invalidating the rule if the litigant is also protected by an injunction from a different court, and (2) whether the federal government lawfully exempted religious objectors from the regulatory requirement to provide health plans that include contraceptive coverage. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision allowed agencies to exempt certain employers from the contraception mandate found in the Affordable Care Act. |
---|---|
Item Description: | "Nos. 19-431 & 19-454." "March 6, 2020." |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (ix, 28 pages). |
Bibliography: | "Table of authorities": Pages iv-ix. |