In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona : brief of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty /
After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so?
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[United States] :
[publisher not identified],
[2019]
|
Series: | Criminal justice & criminology.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | HeinOnline Criminal Justice & Criminology |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ccn00974506 | ||
006 | m fo d | ||
007 | cr bn nnnauuuu | ||
008 | 210501s2019 xxu obv 000 0 eng d | ||
040 | |a NjRocCCS |b eng |e rda |c NjRocCCS | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bergquist, Amy, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent : |b on writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona : brief of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty / |c Amy Bergquist, counsel of record [and 4 others], counsel for amicus curiae. |
246 | 1 | |i HeinOnline index title: |a Brief amici curiae of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty | |
264 | 1 | |a [United States] : |b [publisher not identified], |c [2019] | |
264 | 2 | |a [Getzville, New York] : |b William S. Hein & Company, |c [2021] | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (ix, 24 pages). | ||
336 | |a text |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a HeinOnline criminal justice & criminology | |
500 | |a "No. 18-1109." | ||
500 | |a "August 28, 2019"--Page 24. | ||
504 | |a "Table of authorities"--Pages ii-ix. | ||
520 | |a After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so? | ||
588 | |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed May 1, 2021. | ||
650 | 0 | |a Retroactive judicial decisions |z United States |v Cases. | |
650 | 0 | |a Capital punishment |z United States |x States |v Cases. | |
650 | 0 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) |z United States |v Cases. | |
650 | 0 | |a Extenuating circumstances |z United States |v Cases. | |
655 | 0 | |a Electronic books. | |
655 | 7 | |a Records and briefs. |2 lcgft | |
700 | 1 | |a McKinney, James Erin, |e petitioner. | |
710 | 1 | |a Arizona, |e respondent. | |
710 | 2 | |a Advocates for Human Rights, |e amicus curiae. | |
710 | 2 | |a World Coalition against the Death Penalty, |e amicus curiae. | |
710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. | |
710 | 1 | |a Arizona. |b Supreme Court. | |
830 | 0 | |a Criminal justice & criminology. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |3 HeinOnline Criminal Justice & Criminology |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.preview/supctlpx0001&id=1&collection=agopinions&index=alpha/B_agopinions |
949 | |a KF 225 .M45 B47 2019 |w LC |c 1 |i 974506-1001 |d 5/24/2021 |l MAIN |m HEN |q 1 |r Y |s Y |t WEB |u 5/1/2021 |x ENG |z N-US | ||
997 | |a ©2021 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. | ||
998 | |a inter | ||
999 | |c 201598 | ||
852 | |a Law Library |b online |