In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona : brief of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty /

After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bergquist, Amy (Author)
Corporate Authors: Arizona (Respondent), Advocates for Human Rights (amicus curiae.), World Coalition against the Death Penalty (amicus curiae.), United States. Supreme Court, Arizona. Supreme Court
Other Authors: McKinney, James Erin (petitioner.)
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: [United States] : [publisher not identified], [2019]
Series:Criminal justice & criminology.
Subjects:
Online Access:HeinOnline Criminal Justice & Criminology
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 ccn00974506
006 m fo d
007 cr bn nnnauuuu
008 210501s2019 xxu obv 000 0 eng d
040 |a NjRocCCS  |b eng  |e rda  |c NjRocCCS 
043 |a n-us--- 
100 1 |a Bergquist, Amy,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent :  |b on writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona : brief of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty /  |c Amy Bergquist, counsel of record [and 4 others], counsel for amicus curiae. 
246 1 |i HeinOnline index title:  |a Brief amici curiae of the Advocates for Human Rights and the World Coalition against the Death Penalty 
264 1 |a [United States] :  |b [publisher not identified],  |c [2019] 
264 2 |a [Getzville, New York] :  |b William S. Hein & Company,  |c [2021] 
300 |a 1 online resource (ix, 24 pages). 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a HeinOnline criminal justice & criminology 
500 |a "No. 18-1109." 
500 |a "August 28, 2019"--Page 24. 
504 |a "Table of authorities"--Pages ii-ix. 
520 |a After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so? 
588 |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed May 1, 2021. 
650 0 |a Retroactive judicial decisions  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Capital punishment  |z United States  |x States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Sentences (Criminal procedure)  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Extenuating circumstances  |z United States  |v Cases. 
655 0 |a Electronic books. 
655 7 |a Records and briefs.  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a McKinney, James Erin,  |e petitioner. 
710 1 |a Arizona,  |e respondent. 
710 2 |a Advocates for Human Rights,  |e amicus curiae. 
710 2 |a World Coalition against the Death Penalty,  |e amicus curiae. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
710 1 |a Arizona.  |b Supreme Court. 
830 0 |a Criminal justice & criminology. 
856 4 0 |3 HeinOnline Criminal Justice & Criminology  |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.preview/supctlpx0001&id=1&collection=agopinions&index=alpha/B_agopinions 
949 |a KF 225 .M45 B47 2019  |w LC  |c 1  |i 974506-1001  |d 5/24/2021  |l MAIN  |m HEN  |q 1  |r Y  |s Y  |t WEB  |u 5/1/2021  |x ENG  |z N-US 
997 |a ©2021 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. 
998 |a inter 
999 |c 201598 
852 |a Law Library  |b online