In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor, et al., respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : brief of amici curiae Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the states of California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, and Washington and the District Of Columbia [and 20 others] on the merits and in support of affirmance in favor of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor /

Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States concerning constitutionality of definition of marriage contained in federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which precluded federal recognition of same sex marriages authorized under state law.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trachtman, Jeffrey S. (Author)
Corporate Authors: United States (petitioner.), Empire State Pride Agenda (amicus curiae.), United States. Supreme Court, United States. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Other Authors: Windsor, Edie (Respondent)
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: [United States] : [Cockle Law Brief Printing Co.], [2013]
Series:LGBTQ+ rights.
Religion and the law.
New York legal research library.
Subjects:
Online Access:HeinOnline Religion and the Law
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 i 4500
001 ccn001047694
006 m fo d
007 cr bn nnnauuuu
008 220705s2013 xxu obv 000 0 eng d
040 |a NjRocCCS  |b eng  |e rda  |c NjRocCCS 
043 |a n-us--- 
100 1 |a Trachtman, Jeffrey S.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States, petitioner, v. Edith Schlain Windsor, et al., respondents :  |b on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit : brief of amici curiae Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the states of California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, and Washington and the District Of Columbia [and 20 others] on the merits and in support of affirmance in favor of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor /  |c Jeffrey S. Trachtman, counsel of record [and 4 others], counsel for amici curiae. 
246 1 |i HeinOnline index title:  |a Brief for Bishops of the Episcopal Churchin California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, and Washington and the District Of Columbia; the Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Manhattan Conference of the Metropolitan New York Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; the Rabbinical Assembly; the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association; Reconstructionist Rabbinical College; Rabbi Akiva Herzfeld of Shaarey Tphiloh; the Union for Reform Judaism; Unitarian Universalist Association; United Church of Christ; the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism; Affirmation; Covenant Network of Presbyterians; Friends for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Concerns; Methodist Federation for Social Action; More Light Presbyterians; Presbyterian Welcome; Reconciling Ministries Network; Reconciling Works: Lutherans for Full Participation; and Religious Institute, Inc.in support of respondent Edith Schlain Windsor 
264 1 |a [United States] :  |b [Cockle Law Brief Printing Co.],  |c [2013] 
264 2 |a [Getzville, New York] :  |b William S. Hein & Company,  |c [2022] 
300 |a 1 online resource (xiv, 40, A6 pages). 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a HeinOnline LGBTQ+ rights 
490 1 |a HeinOnline religion and the law 
490 1 |a HeinOnline New York legal research library 
500 |a "No. 12-307." 
500 |a "February 28, 2013"--Page 40. 
504 |a "Table of authorities"--Pages iii-xiv. 
520 |a Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States concerning constitutionality of definition of marriage contained in federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which precluded federal recognition of same sex marriages authorized under state law. 
588 |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed July 5, 2022. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |t Defense of Marriage Act  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Sexual orientation  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Marriage law  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Conflict of laws  |x Marriage  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Same-sex marriage  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Gay couples  |x Legal status, laws, etc.  |z United States  |v Cases. 
655 7 |a Records and briefs.  |2 lcgft 
700 1 |a Windsor, Edie,  |e respondent. 
710 1 |a United States,  |e petitioner. 
710 2 |a Empire State Pride Agenda,  |e amicus curiae. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) 
773 1 |t American Bar Association www.supremecourtpreview.org 
830 0 |a LGBTQ+ rights. 
830 0 |a Religion and the law. 
830 0 |a New York legal research library. 
856 4 0 |3 HeinOnline Religion and the Law  |u http://ezp1.villanova.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=preview/prvwpepslie&collection=religion 
949 |a KF 229 .U54 T73 2013  |w LC  |c 1  |i 1047694-1001  |d 9/9/2022  |l MAIN  |m HEN  |q 2  |r Y  |s Y  |t WEB  |u 7/5/2022  |x ENG  |z N-US 
997 |a ©2022 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. 
998 |a inter 
999 |c 351507 
852 |a Law Library  |b online