Philosopher kings? : the adjudication of conflicting human rights and social values /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christie, George C
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, c2011
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 a 4500
001 664842357
003 OCoLC
005 20110512031936.0
008 100920s2011 enk b 001 0 eng
010 |a 2010039887 
020 |a 9780195341157 (hbk. : alk. paper) 
020 |a 0195341155 (hbk. : alk. paper) 
040 |a DLC  |c DLC  |d YDX  |d YDXCP  |d BWX  |d CDX 
042 |a pcc 
049 |a VLAM 
050 0 0 |a K3240  |b .C4748 2011 
100 1 |a Christie, George C 
245 1 0 |a Philosopher kings? :  |b the adjudication of conflicting human rights and social values /  |c George C. Christie 
260 |a Oxford ;  |a New York :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c c2011 
300 |a xiv, 195 p. ;  |c 24 cm 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-181) and index 
505 0 |a Introduction -- "Rights" discourse -- Structural impediments to consistent application of "universal" human rights -- The enlarged view of rights in contemporary constitutions and human rights conventions : the notion of defeasible rights -- Litigation involving a conflict of rights, each of equal value -- The epistemology of judicial decision making -- The unsuccessful attempt to find a philosophical "North Star" to aid in judicial decision making -- The use of balancing tests and factor analysis : the inevitable tendency to resort to bright-line tests -- An overview of case-by-case adjudication, its possible goals, and the influence of legal traditions -- The optimal conditions for case-by-case adjudication and its limits -- Case-by-case adjudication of contentious human rights controversies -- What if we must choose? 
650 0 |a Human rights  |v Cases 
907 |a .b2125390 
998 |a lower 
999 |c 97100 
852 |a Law Library  |b Lower Level  |h K3240 .C4748 2011  |p 33940004076798